Dear Authors,
While browsing through the Pangenome files, we noticed a strange pattern: For some contigs, we see genes that have the same start-end position but different Uniref90 IDs annotated (in a single contig).
Here, we attach some examples:
From Mycolicibacterium_obuense
.
UniRef90_A0A0M2WDJ6 WN67_31095 GCA_000974925 LAUZ02000002.1 72597 93944
...
UniRef90_A0A0J6VR76 WN67_31095 GCA_000974925 LAUZ02000002.1 72597 93944
From Lysobacter_capsici
UniRef90_A0A0Q8IVI6 dltA GCA_001442785 CP011130.1 2970103 2990550
...
UniRef90_A0A0Q8J2G6 dltA GCA_001442785 CP011130.1 2970103 2990550
...
UniRef90_A0A108U5G5 dltA GCA_001442785 CP011130.1 2970103 2990550
...
UniRef90_A0A0Q8J5V4 dltA GCA_001442785 CP011130.1 2970103 2990550
From Azospirillum_lipoferum
UniRef90_D3NZV3 potB GCA_000010725 AP010946.1 379665 380549
UniRef90_D3P1E1 potB GCA_000010725 AP010946.1 379665 380549
UniRef90_A0A2K1G431 potB GCA_000010725 AP010946.1 379665 380549
UniRef90_D3P3T7 potB GCA_000010725 AP010946.1 379665 380549
UniRef90_D3NRD9 potB GCA_000010725 AP010946.1 379665 380549
UniRef90_D3P6E0 potB GCA_000010725 AP010946.1 379665 380549
UniRef90_D3P2M5 potB GCA_000010725 AP010946.1 379665 380549
UniRef90_D3P3Y5 potB GCA_000010725 AP010946.1 379665 380549
We are suspecting that this is due to the fact that the annotations are constantly updated, however are still not sure if this behaviour was wanted.
Best,
Eric Cho